June 19, 2013, 05:06:30 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: humbleservant on December 04, 2010, 09:06:56 PMYes, Sr. Linda,And I don't believe this makes them any less valuable to the Lord, by them choosing to have an earthly hope following their calling, instead of accepting the upward call.IonNot of any less value, no more than the rest of mankind in whom the Father loved so much that he sacrificed his only begotten Son, but...Nevertheless those who have received of a knowledge of the high calling and who have nevertheless declined this offer preferring rather to live upon the earth have in essence "received the grace of God in vain." (2 Cor 6:1) That is to say they have chosen to decline the favor of this invitation to set aside the earthly for the heavenly that they might be where he [our Lord] is), in this they give evidence that they lack the spirit of a sound mind, imagining earthly rewards, pleasures in paradise restored could in anyway come close to the heavenly offering of joint heir-ship with their Lord and immorality.
Yes, Sr. Linda,And I don't believe this makes them any less valuable to the Lord, by them choosing to have an earthly hope following their calling, instead of accepting the upward call.Ion
Let us suppose that Rutherford never took over the Bible Student faith. And that Br. Russell's Will had been adhered to after his death.... It is possible that at some point during the decades that followed, the numbers of Bible Students around the world would have exceeded the 144,000 mark. Is this a reasonable assumption? And if that were so, those Bible Students leading the friends would have to find a reason for such an increase. And how would they have explained it?
The number of partakers continued to slowly increase until in 2007 the Society changed and removed the 1935 block to new partakers. Since then the number continues to increase to almost 11,000 in 2010. What the removal of the 1935 barrier will hold for the future remains to be seen.
Quote from: Linda on December 13, 2010, 02:36:29 PMThe number of partakers continued to slowly increase until in 2007 the Society changed and removed the 1935 block to new partakers. Since then the number continues to increase to almost 11,000 in 2010. What the removal of the 1935 barrier will hold for the future remains to be seen. Once the GB is represented by mostly younger men, I would expect that they will close the door again. This removal of the 1935 block was necessary to explain why the GB was dying out. Thank you for your input Sr Linda.
Quote from: bro tom on December 13, 2010, 05:55:57 PMQuote from: Linda on December 13, 2010, 02:36:29 PMThe number of partakers continued to slowly increase until in 2007 the Society changed and removed the 1935 block to new partakers. Since then the number continues to increase to almost 11,000 in 2010. What the removal of the 1935 barrier will hold for the future remains to be seen. Once the GB is represented by mostly younger men, I would expect that they will close the door again. This removal of the 1935 block was necessary to explain why the GB was dying out. Thank you for your input Sr Linda.The 2007 change was made with the majority of the GB already being younger men. The average age now is in the 50's and early 60's. So it had nothing to do with the GB dying out.
How could the GB have younger men in 2007 if the door closed in 1935? That would make the youngest 72 years old. They must have let the door open from time to time as needed. Smile